Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Board of Education Howard County v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03067
Plaintiff:
Board of Education Howard County
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc., Facebook Payments, Inc., Siculus Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Board of Education of Howard County v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02842
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Education of Howard County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Board of Education of Howard County v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03760
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Education of Howard County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Howard County, Maryland v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv04026
Plaintiff:
Howard County, Maryland
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Planet Aid, Inc., et al v. Reveal, et al
as 21-15690
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISBETH THOMSEN, An alien and permanent resident of Chilangoma, Malawi and PLANET AID, INC., A Massachusetts Corporation which has its principal place of business in Howard County, Maryland
Defendant / Appellee:
AMY WALTERS, REVEAL, CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING and others
City of Boston, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-72749
Petitioner:
CITY OF PIEDMONT, California, HOWARD COUNTY, Maryland, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, Maryland and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Howard County, Maryland v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv03171
Defendant:
Altria Group Inc., Eonsmoke, LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company and others
Plaintiff:
Howard County, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-72760
Petitioner:
LAREDO, TEXAS, CHEVY CHASE VILLAGE, MARYLAND, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
City of Austin, Texas, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70341
Intervenor:
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor:
CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
