Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Worsham et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv03567
Plaintiff:
James Akin Worsham, Sr. and Leverne Davis Worsham
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tucker v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv01176
Plaintiff:
Anthony W. Tucker
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Crosslink, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hurlebaus et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maria Teresa Hurlebaus and John Hurlebaus
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cofield et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 3:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
Menda May Cofield and Billy L. Cofield
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hieber v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2013cv02761
Plaintiff:
Frances Hieber
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2013cv02760
Plaintiff:
Cory Adams
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2013cv02762
Plaintiff:
James D. Williams
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILKERSON v. STRYKER CORPORATION et al
as 5:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILKERSON
Defendant:
STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER SALES CORPORATION and HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Parker v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
Barbara Parker
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pdl
Moore et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
Annie Merle Phillips Moore and Earnest Eugene Moore
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
