Cases 11 - 20 of 24
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (U.S.A.) v. STEVENS
as 1:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (U.S.A.)
Defendant:
LIZABETH STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitney Hancock, et al v. Urban Outfitters, Inc., et al
as 14-7047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Whitney Hancock, On behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and Jamie White, On behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Urban Outfitters, Inc. and Anthropologie, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-7015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HANCOCK et al v. URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv00939
Plaintiff:
WHITNEY HANCOCK and JAMIE WHITE
Defendant:
URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC. and ANTHROPOLOGIE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HERRING v. V STREET FREDDIE HOUSE et al
as 1:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
ANGELA MARIE HERRING
Defendant:
V STREET FREDDIE HOUSE, EDNA HOLDER, JOHN HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
GERALD v. HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2012cv01152
Plaintiff:
JEANNEE GERALD
Defendant:
HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HAIRE et al v. SMITH, CURRIE & HANCOCK LLP
as 1:2012cv00749
Plaintiff:
DIRK D. HAIRE and REGINALD M. JONES
Defendant:
SMITH, CURRIE & HANCOCK LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANCOCK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv01450
Plaintiff:
CHANNELL HANCOCK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
APPLETON MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2010cv01498
Plaintiff:
APPLETON MEDICAL CENTER , ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL, INC. , BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
