Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at01118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Essex Wilshire, L.P. v. Valley Whipz et al
as 8:2024cv01204
Plaintiff:
Essex Wilshire, L.P.
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10 inclusive, Hari Ray and Valley Whipz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Notice of Removal - Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Hari Krishna Sami v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv01103
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Hari Kirshna Sami
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
IN RE: 23ANDME, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 3:2024md03098
Defendant:
23andMe, Inc. and 23ANDME Holding Co
Plaintiff:
Michele Bacus, Paula Kleynburd, Camie Picha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gelasio v. ZAFAR et al
as 3:2024cv01555
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gelasio
Defendant:
HARIS BIN ZAFAR and PROJECT ETHER LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Epperson v. Deutsche Bank et al
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Chris Epperson
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank, Lyndon B Johnson, Hary S. Truman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mirza v. 23andMe, Inc.
as 3:2023cv05259
Plaintiff:
Haris Mirza
Defendant:
23andMe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Gelasio v. Zafar et al
as 3:2023cv04618
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GELASIO
Defendant:
HARIS BIN ZAFAR and PROJECT ETHER LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
