Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lin et al v. Haru Holding Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv07464
Plaintiff:
En Ai Lin, Zifu Zheng, Zhenghua Wang and others
Defendant:
Haru Holding Corp., Haru Broadway Corp., Haru Gramercy Park Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Morales Fortiz et al v. Haru Holding, Corp et al
as 1:2021cv04630
Defendant:
Steven Lay and Haru Holding, Corp doing business as Haru Sushi
Plaintiff:
Josefino Morales Fortiz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lin et al v. Benihana Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11226
Defendant:
Haru Wall Street Corp., Haru Amsterdam Avenue Corp., Benihana New York Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Gongyi Wang, Ren Gui Liu and En Ai Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Primo v. Benihana National Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv09589
Plaintiff:
Carlos Primo
Defendant:
Benihana National Corp. , Haru Holding Corp. , Haru Gramercy Park Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Haru Holding Corp. v. Sapporo Ichiban Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06287
Plaintiff:
Haru Holding Corp.
Defendant:
Sapporo Ichiban Inc. and Chen De Wu
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Haru Holding Corp. v. Harusaki Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04365
Plaintiff:
Haru Holding Corp.
Defendant:
Harusaki Inc. and Alvin Zheng
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Haru Holding Corp. v. Kydia Incorporated et al
as 2:2013cv06544
Defendant:
Haru Ginger Restuarant, Inc. and Kydia Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Haru Holding Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Haru Holding Corp. v. Haru Hana Sushi Inc.
as 1:2013cv07705
Plaintiff:
Haru Holding Corp.
Defendant:
Haru Hana Sushi Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Haru Holding Corp. v. Yune's Oriental Restaurant, Inc
as 1:2013cv05092
Plaintiff:
Haru Holding Corp.
Defendant:
Yune's Oriental Restaurant, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
