Cases 1 - 8 of 8
FULLER v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv87749
Plaintiff:
ROBERT NMI FULLER
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LANTRIP v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv87733
Plaintiff:
KENNETH W. LANTRIP
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GREEN v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv87736
Plaintiff:
FORD GREEN
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCCRAY v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv87743
Plaintiff:
RENA MAE MCCRAY
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PARVIN v. AMETEK, INC. F/K/A THE WHITLOCK MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv87768
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN PARVIN
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC. F/K/A THE WHITLOCK MANUFACTURING COMPANY, AMETEK, INC. F/K/A THE WHITLOCK MANUFACTURING COMPANY, KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PIPKIN v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv87735
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER PIPKIN and SYLVESTER PIPKIN
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WATTS v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85894
Plaintiff:
PERTIS RANDER WATTS and PERTIS RANDER WATTS
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., CERTAINTEED CORP., CHAMPLAIN CABLE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WARD v. HAVEG INDUSTRIES, INC., SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO HAVEG CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv64531
Plaintiff:
JOHN WARD
Defendant:
HAVEG INDUSTRIES, INC., SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO HAVEG CORPORATION, HERCULES INCORPORATED, ASBESTOS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
