Cases 1 - 10 of 187
MATERA v. MISICKO et al
as 1:2021cv01165
Cross Defendant:
Robert C. Leatherwood
Cross Claimant:
Andrew D. Misicko
Plaintiff:
Hazel Matera
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
HARRY v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05739
Plaintiff:
HAZEL HARRY
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREEZE v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04197
Plaintiff:
HAZEL FREEZE
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCGRAW v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20040
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORP and MERCK & CO INC
Plaintiff:
HAZEL MCGRAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BAILEY et al v. BAYER, CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv02166
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY BAILEY , MICHELLE GARCIA , ROBIN STEPHENSON and others
Defendant:
BAYER, CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORROW v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02589
Plaintiff:
HAZEL I. MORROW
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv01359
Plaintiff:
HAZEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SYREK et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05910
Plaintiff:
JOHN SYREK , GREGORY ADAMS , SHIRLEY MCCOY and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOSHLIN et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05857
Plaintiff:
OSEY JOSHLIN , WANDA KELSOE , LAURA KINKADE and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PACHECO et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05827
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH PACHECO , DOREEN TRACEY , KATHRYN DENAUT and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
