Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, State of Louisiana, City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 6:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01504
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Abel et al v. PORCH.COM INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00694
Defendant:
Matthew Erlichman, GOSMITH INC., Darwin Widjaja and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Barker, Mark Anderson, Cyril Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Pearson et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00697
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Foulger, Holly Garner, Nichole Lynott and others
Defendant:
Darwin Widjaja, Matthew Ehrlichman, Brenton Marrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Stringham v. Flagstar Bank et al
as 6:2018cv01046
Defendant:
Creekside Rentals, First American Title Co., Flagstar Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Heather A. Stringham
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Quaas v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 6:2013cv02070
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Heather Quaas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
