Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ipson v. Viatris et al
as 2:2021cv00643
Plaintiff:
Landon Ipson
Defendant:
Viatris, Mylan Specialty, Mylan Pharmaceuticals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hafen v. Dearden et al
as 2:2019cv00909
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Heather Smith Taylor, Michael Dearden, Patty Dearden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Hafen v. Barnes et al
as 2:2019cv00912
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Pamela Sanchez, Heather Cummens, Sonya Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Bullock v. Knight Adjustment Bureau
as 1:2019cv00074
Plaintiff:
Heather Bullock
Defendant:
Knight Adjustment Bureau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gregory et al v. Zions Bancorporation
as 2:2019cv00015
Plaintiff:
Wayne Baker, Mike Israel, Stephen Beverley and others
Defendant:
Zions Bancorporation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Corey Thurman, Edward Terry, JDH Family LTD Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Windham v. Allen et al
as 2:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Maria E. Windham
Defendant:
Nathaniel Robert Allen, Heather Allen, Nate Allen Financial Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Helo Energy et al v. Hoggan et al
as 1:2016mc00016
Plaintiff:
Helo Energy , Sand Canyon of Tehachapi and Saugatuck Energy
Defendant:
Jefrey Hoggan , Kent A. Hoggan , Heather K. Kann and others
Cross_defendant:
RAR Energy Consulting, Fishcreek Capital Funding, Rudy Saenz and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Gallo v. Bonneville Billing and Collections et al
as 2:2012cv00265
Plaintiff:
Heather Marie Gallo
Defendant:
Bonneville Billing and Collections and Kevin P. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
24 Hour Fitness USA v. Hale
as 2:2011mc01132
Petitioner:
24 Hour Fitness USA
Respondent:
Heather Hale
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
