Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Jaime Charboneau v. Henry Atencio, et al
as 17-72507
Petitioner:
JAIME DEAN CHARBONEAU
Respondent:
HENRY ATENCIO, Director of the Idaho Department of Correction and LAWRENCE G. WASDEN, Attorney General
Zazweta v. Dentist Unknown et al
as 1:2017cv00362
Plaintiff:
Dominick A Zazweta
Defendant:
Dentist Unknown, IMSI, Corizon, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charboneau v. Atencio et al
as 1:2017cv00364
Petitioner:
Jaime Dean Charboneau
Respondent:
Henry Atencio and Lawrence G Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willard v. Atencio et al
as 1:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
Cody RD Willard
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Alberto Ramirez, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Hayes
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Henry Atencio, Shannon Cluney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richmond v. Garcia et al
as 1:2017cv00210
Petitioner:
Robert Arthur Richmond
Respondent:
Rene Garcia, Terry Kirkham and Henry Atencio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bartlett et al v. Atencio et al
as 1:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Bartlett , Kenneth F Felder , Brian Halstrom and others
Defendant:
Henry Atencio , Jeff Zmuda , Ashley Dowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Wolf, et al v. Idaho State Board of Correctio, et al
as 17-35273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW J.J. WOLF and R. HANS KRUGER
Defendant - Appellee:
IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, IDAHO COMMISSION FOR PARDONS & PAROLE, BILL YOUNG and others
Ellis v. Atencio et al
as 1:2017cv00106
Petitioner:
Mark Lee Ellis
Respondent:
Henry Atencio and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bautista-Aguayo v. Atencio et al
as 3:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
Emmanual Bautista-Aguayo
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Shannon Cluney, Howard Yordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
