Cases 41 - 50 of 125
GARRETT v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85967
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE GARRETT and CLAUDE GARRETT
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., ASTENJOHNSON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILSON v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85921
Plaintiff:
LEAVERN WILSON and LEAVERN WILSON
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., CHAMPLAIN CABLE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ROBINSON v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85961
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROBINSON and MICHAEL ROBINSON
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SAWYER v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85895
Plaintiff:
WARDELL SAWYER and WARDELL SAWYER
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
THORNTON v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85974
Plaintiff:
ROLAND L. THORNTON and ROLAND L. THORNTON
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., ASTEN JOHNSON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SPARKMAN v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85959
Plaintiff:
BENNIE LUTHER SPARKMAN and BENNIE LUTHER SPARKMAN
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GOODEN v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85886
Plaintiff:
WILLIE GOODEN and WILLIE GOODEN
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
STUCKEY v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85946
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. STUCKEY and JAMES L. STUCKEY
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BARNWELL v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85940
Plaintiff:
JEAN BARNWELL, JEAN BARNWELL and JEAN BARNWELL
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CUPSTID v. SHELL OIL COMPANY et al
as 5:2008cv87035
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. CUPSTID, JR. and ROBERT J. CUPSTID, JR.
Defendant:
SHELL OIL COMPANY, BORG-WARNER, INC., NASH ENGINEERING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
