Cases 21 - 30 of 120
HARGRAVE v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85972
Plaintiff:
WALTER HARGRAVE and WALTER HARGRAVE
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HENDERSON v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85997
Plaintiff:
MILDRED BLACKWELL HENDERSON and MILDRED BLACKWELL HENDERSON
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BUCKLEY v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85991
Plaintiff:
JAMES BUCKLEY, JAMES BUCKLEY and JAMES BUCKLEY
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BROWN v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85993
Plaintiff:
BYRON L. BROWN, BYRON L. BROWN and BYRON L. BROWN
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GRANT v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86006
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. GRANT and JOHN D. GRANT
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RIGNEY v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85977
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL RIGNEY and JOHN PAUL RIGNEY
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCDONALD v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85990
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MCDONALD
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., BENDIX CORPORATION, BENDIX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PLAMER v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85981
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MCARTHUR PLAMER and CHARLES MCARTHUR PLAMER
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., CHAMPLAIN CABLE CORPORATION, CHAMPLAIN CABLE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MOZINGO v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85922
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL EARL MOZINGO and SAMUEL EARL MOZINGO
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BRYAN v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86011
Plaintiff:
CONEY B. BRYAN, CONEY B. BRYAN and CONEY B. BRYAN
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., ASTEN JOHNSON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
