Cases 41 - 50 of 120
THORNTON v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85974
Plaintiff:
ROLAND L. THORNTON and ROLAND L. THORNTON
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., ASTEN JOHNSON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SPARKMAN v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85959
Plaintiff:
BENNIE LUTHER SPARKMAN and BENNIE LUTHER SPARKMAN
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GOODEN v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85886
Plaintiff:
WILLIE GOODEN and WILLIE GOODEN
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
STUCKEY v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85946
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. STUCKEY and JAMES L. STUCKEY
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BARNWELL v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85940
Plaintiff:
JEAN BARNWELL, JEAN BARNWELL and JEAN BARNWELL
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CUPSTID v. SHELL OIL COMPANY et al
as 5:2008cv87035
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. CUPSTID, JR. and ROBERT J. CUPSTID, JR.
Defendant:
SHELL OIL COMPANY, BORG-WARNER, INC., NASH ENGINEERING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BILBRO v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85884
Plaintiff:
JIMMY BILBRO, JIMMY BILBRO and JIMMY BILBRO
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
REID v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85999
Plaintiff:
BILLY REID and BILLY REID
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FIELD v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85890
Plaintiff:
JOHN FIELD and JOHN FIELD
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TICKELL v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86010
Plaintiff:
LLOYD SUMMERS TICKELL, JR. and LLOYD SUMMERS TICKELL, JR.
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
