Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Caterpillar Logistics, Inc. v. Hilda Soli
as 13-1106
Petitioner:
CATERPILLAR LOGISTICS SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Party-in-Interest:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, Local 974
Elliot Construction Corporatio v. OSHRC, et al
as 12-3424
Petitioner:
ELLIOT CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Respondent:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Hilda Solis v. Barringer Brother Roofing, Inc
as 12-2451
Petitioner:
HILDA L. SOLIS, United States Secretary of Labor
Respondent:
BARRINGER BROTHER ROOFING, INCORPORATED
Oak - Leyden Developmental Services, Inc. v. Solis et al
as 1:2012cv01876
Plaintiff:
Oak - Leyden Developmental Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Hilda L Solis and Phyllis C Borzi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
Hilda L Solis v Milk Specialties Company
as 2:2011mc00072
Plaintiff:
Hilda L Solis
Defendant:
Milk Specialties Company
Caterpillar Logistics Services v. Hilda Soli
as 11-2958
Petitioner:
CATERPILLAR LOGISTICS SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
HILDA L. SOLIS
KS Energy Services, LLC v. Hilda Soli
as 11-2427
Petitioner:
KS ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
Respondent:
HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor
Solis v. Hannah Marine Corp
as 1:2011cv02587
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Hannah Marine Corp
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
National Roofing Contractors A, et al v. LABR, et al
as 11-1340
Petitioner:
NATIONAL ROOFING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, KORELLIS ROOFING, INCORPORATED, TILSEN ROOFING COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, HILDA L. SOLIS, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION and others
Solis, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company
as 3:2011mc50001
Petitioner:
Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor
Respondent:
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
