Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Government App Solutions, Inc. v. City of New Haven, et al
as 23-15708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GOVERNMENT APP SOLUTIONS, INC., a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEW HAVEN, KEVIN M. JOHNSON, NICOLE WEST and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MICHAEL ANDERSON and others
Government App Solutions, Inc. v. FBI, et al
as 2:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Gregory J. Stanton, Michael Tubbs, Andrea Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Government App Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Jeffrey Isaacs v. USC Keck School of Medicine, et al
as 20-55633
Defendant:
DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER, NH BOARD OF MEDICINE, TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
USC KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY ISAACS, Dr.
Jeffrey Isaacs v. USC Keck School of Medicine, et al
as 20-55239
Defendant / Appellee:
DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER, GIBSON DUNN AND CRUTCHER LLP, USC KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY ISAACS, Dr.
Dr. Jeffrey Isaacs v. USC Keck School of Medicine et al
as 2:2019cv08000
Defendant:
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, NH Board of Medicine, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jeffrey Isaacs
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Dr. Jeffrey Isaacs v. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center et al
as 2:2019cv02011
Defendant:
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, NH Board of Medicine, USC Keck School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jeffrey Isaacs and Jeffrey David Isaacs
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
The Cancer Foundation, Inc. et al v. Cerberus Capital Management, LP et al
as 1:2007cv04120
Plaintiff:
The Cancer Foundation, Inc., Alleco, Inc., Charles Amera and others
Defendant:
Cerberus Capital Management, LP, Madeleine, LLC, Gordon Brothers Group and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
