Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Allen v. Lincoln Electric Company et al.
as 1:2008wf17576
Plaintiff:
Grover Allen
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Inc., The, Hobart Brothers Corporation, Illinois Tool Works, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Connery v. Lincoln Electric Co. et al.
as 1:2008wf17501
Plaintiff:
Thomas W Connery
Defendant:
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Airco/The BOC Group, Inc., Arcos Industries LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fowler et al v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17445
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Fowler and Mary A. Fowler
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Corporation, ESAB Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Franklin et al v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17447
Plaintiff:
Wayne Franklin
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Corporation, ESAB Group, Inc. and others
Debtor:
Bohler Thyssen Welding USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Eisenzimmer et al v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17319
Plaintiff:
Gerald A. Eisenzimmer and Shirley Eisenzimmer
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Corporation, ESAB Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bublitz v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17154
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Bublitz
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Corporation, ESAB Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Tun v. Allegheny Technologies Inc., et al
as 1:2008wf17031
Defendant:
Allegheny Technologies Inc., A.O. Smith Corporation, Avesta Polarit, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Tun
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Nickelson v. Allegheny Technologies Inc. et al
as 1:2008wf17030
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Nickelson
Defendant:
Allegheny Technologies Inc., A.O. Smith Corporation, Avesta Polarit, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
