Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Dunn v. D.R. Horton-Georgia, LLC
as 1:2024cv01330
Plaintiff:
Franchot Dunn
Defendant:
D.R. Horton-Georgia, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Stone v. Horton
as 3:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Tammy Junior Stone
Defendant:
Avery Kamil Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
HORTON v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF GEORGIA, LLC
as 5:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
CORNELIA HORTON
Defendant:
FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF GEORGIA, LLC and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Horton v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04024
Plaintiff:
Brooke Horton
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horton v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al.
as 1:2021cv02435
Defendant:
Teva Women's Health Inc doing business as Teva Women's Health LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Teva Women's Health LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Horton Transportation LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02379
Plaintiff:
Lindon Wilson
Defendant:
Tyler Yother, Cherokee Insurance Company and Horton Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Horton v. Reeves et al
as 1:2018cv00165
Defendant:
McDuffie County, Durwood Davis, Roy Reeves and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03118
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
David Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02539
Plaintiff:
Robert Horton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
William S. Horton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
