Cases 1 - 10 of 48
DENT v. WHITE HOUSE et al
as 1:2023cv02517
Plaintiff:
JASON DENT
Defendant:
WHITE HOUSE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
NERIO v. INTERNAL HOUSE-TEXAS
as 1:2023cv02179
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD ANTHONY NERIO
Defendant:
INTERNAL HOUSE-TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIOTT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 1:2022cv03257
Plaintiff:
DAMON ELLIOTT
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Russell Hill v. Nancy Pelosi
as 22-5142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Russell Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives
Jaime Luevano v. White House Staff
as 22-5032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant / Appellee:
White House Staff
BANKS v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2021cv00301
Defendant:
TRUMP ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DESIGNATION AND SENTENCE COMPUTATION CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REDFORD v. MEMBERS OF U.S. SENATE et al
as 1:2019cv02042
Defendant:
MEMBERS OF U.S. SENATE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, MEMBERS OF U.S. HOUSE OF REP. and others
Plaintiff:
MIKE REDFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01642
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
SEFIANE v. BEAUMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv01315
Plaintiff:
SAMAD SEFIANE
Defendant:
BEAUMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT, ERIN SMITH and JEFFERSON COUNTY COURT HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erin House v. Kenneth Courter
as 17-5053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Erin Dale House
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Courter, Acting Chief, Office of Enforcement Operations, DOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
