Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Jonathan Holmes, Sr., et al v. United States Air Force, et al
as 10-15681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN F. HOLMES, SR. and PAMELA N. HOLMES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, SECRETARY OF THE U.S. AIR FORCE, CHARLES E. STENNER, JR., Commander U.S. Air Force Reserves and others
Medical Center Inc v. Humana Military Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00124
Plaintiff:
Medical Center Inc
Defendant:
Humana Military Healthcare Services, Inc. and PGBA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOLMES v. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
as 3:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN F HOLMES, SR and PAMELA N HOLMES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, MICHAEL B DONLEY, CHARLES E STENNER, JR and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Scavullo v. MCG Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
Philip J. Scavullo
Defendant:
MCG Health, Inc., Cardon Healthcare Network, Inc., Humana Military Healthcare Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
SACRED HEART HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ET AL v. HUMANA MILITARY HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC
as 3:2007cv00062
Plaintiff:
SACRED HEART HEALTH SYSTEMS INC, SACRED HEART HEALTH SYSTEMS INC, ST VINCENT'S HEALTH SYSTEM INC and others
Defendant:
HUMANA MILITARY HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC, HUMANA MILITARY HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC, HUMANA MILITARY HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and others
Counter Claimant:
HUMANA MILITARY HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC, HUMANA MILITARY HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC, HUMANA MILITARY HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and others
Counter Defendant:
BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER OF NASSAU INC, BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER OF NASSAU INC, SACRED HEART HEALTH SYSTEMS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bravo, et al v. United States, et al
as 1:2004cv21807
Plaintiff:
Raiza Bravo and Oscar Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States, Kenneth Kushner, Sterling Medical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
