Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 1 - 10 of 60
HUMPHREY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03929
Plaintiff: JULIE HUMPHREY
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUMPHREY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv18675
Plaintiff: BRANDIE HUMPHREY
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUMPHREYS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv18053
Plaintiff: JENNIFER HUMPHREYS
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUMPHREY v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv13027
Plaintiff: KADEDRA HUMPHREY
Defendant: JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUMPHREY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv04965
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff: SHARON A. HUMPHREY and RICHARD HUMPHREY, JR.
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PEARSON-HUMPHREY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv04593
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff: ANNA LOUISE PEARSON-HUMPHREY and ROBERT HUMPHREY
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUMPHREYS v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv04794
Plaintiff: RONDA HUMPHREYS
Defendant: LIFECELL CORPORATION, ALLERGAN, INC., ALLERGAN USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Humphrey v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD et al
as 1:2022cv05051
In Re: VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff: DINAH HUMPHREY
Defendant: ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD, HUAHAI U.S. INC., SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S., LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
POTTER v. VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv07658
Petitioner: Miami Fire Fighters' and Police Officers' Retirement Trust, Paul Alvater, California Public Employees Retirement System and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: MULTI-STRATEGY MASTER FUND LIMITED, BLACKROCK CREDIT ALPHA MASTER FUND, L.P., LORD ABBETT BOND-DEBENTURE FUND, INC. and others
Defendant: THEO MELAS-KYRIAZI, PHILIDOR NETWORK ENTITIES, VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff: TIMBER HILL LLC, LAURA POTTER and CITY OF TUCSON TOGETHER WITH AND ON BEHALF OF THE TUCSON SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Special Master: HON. DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH, RET.
Not Classified By Court: Cathy Lochridge
Amicus Curiae: Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
Lead Plaintiff: TIAA-CREF
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
HUMPHREY v. ALLERGAN INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03196
Plaintiff: KATHRYN HUMPHREY
Defendant: ALLERGAN INC. F/K/A INAMED CORPORATION F/K/A/ MCGHAN MEDICAL CORPORATION, ALLERGAN USA INC., ALLERGAN INC. and others
In Re: ALLERGAN BIOCELL TEXTURED BREAST IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?