Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Maria S. Valencia v. Hunt and Henriques, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv06642
Plaintiff:
Maria S. Valencia
Defendant:
Hunt and Henriques, Inc. and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Donald Sherrill et al v. George Edward Boston et al
as 8:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Donald Sherrill, Anthony DiPiero and Hunt and Henriques
Defendant:
George Edward Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stanley R. Apps, et al v. Hunts and Henriques, CLP, et al
as 20-17096
Plaintiff:
DIANE GALLEGO
Defendant:
SYNCHRONY BANK
Appellee:
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT S. GITMEID, P.C. and STANLEY R. APPS
Defendant / Appellant:
HUNTS AND HENRIQUES, CLP
Stanley R. Apps, et al v. Hunts and Henriques, CLP, et al
as 20-16982
Plaintiff:
DIANE GALLEGO
Defendant:
SYNCHRONY BANK
Appellant:
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT S. GITMEID, P.C. and STANLEY R. APPS
Defendant / Appellee:
HUNTS AND HENRIQUES, CLP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00443
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
