Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Mohr v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06081
Plaintiff: Raymond Mohr
Defendant: AW Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Crown, Cork & Seal USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Crooks v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06089
Plaintiff: David Crooks
Defendant: AW Chesterton Company, AO Smith Corporation, ABB Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Ortman v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv05042
Plaintiff: David Ortman
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Wohlfert v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv05040
Plaintiff: Wayne Wohlfert
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, ABB, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Pelton et al v. John Crane, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv04316
Plaintiff: Chloyde Pelton, Shirley Pelton and Crown, Cork and Seal Company, Inc., successor-in-interest to Mundet Cork Company
Cross Defendant: John Crane, Inc., IMO Industries Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Turbine, Inc., and C.H. Wheeler Manufacturing Company and Goulds Pumps, LLC
Counter Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Carrier Corporaion, Carrier Global Corporation and others
Defendant: Alfa Laval Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Purifiers, Amtrol Inc., successor-in-interest to Thrush Company and H.A. Thrush Company, Caterpillar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lishman et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01570
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Inc Caterpillar, Crane Co. and others
Counter Defendant: Nash Engineering Co., Inc., Flowserve US Inc., Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Tate Andale, Inc., Velan Valve Corp., Honeywell International Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: John Crane Inc.
Plaintiff: Vicki Lishman
Cross Claimant: Grinnell LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Ayotte v. The Boeing Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02662
Defendant: The Boeing Company , A.W. Chesterton Company, H.B. Fuller Company and others
Plaintiff: Daniel L Ayotte
Cross_claimant: The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company , The Toro Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross_defendant: Daniel L Ayotte , United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC and others
Counter_claimant: Industrial Holdings Corporation , MTD Products, Inc. and Tenneco, Inc.
Counter_defendant: United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC , Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Messel et al v. Viad Corp et al
as 1:2015cv11344
Defendant: Viad Corp , ABB Inc, AGCO Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Walter Francis Messel, Jr. and Bernadette Marie Messel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McAffry et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2015cv10927
Plaintiff: Michael Kevin McAffry and Susan Audrey McAffry
Defendant: 3M Company , The Boeing Company, Crown Cork & Seal Company and others
Cross_claimant: Honeywell International, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Honeywell International, Inc. , 3M Company, Crown Cork & Seal Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirkendall v. AO Smith Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv09024
Plaintiff: Mary Jean Kirkendall
Defendant: A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?