Cases 1 - 10 of 33
GASKINS et al v. INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR
as 2:2011cv66867
Plaintiff:
DAVID GASKINS and SUSAN K. GASKINS
Defendant:
INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAPIER et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67141
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GEORGE RAPIER and THOMAS GALPIN RAPIER
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION , INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOND et al v. INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR
as 2:2011cv66888
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. BOND and MILDRED V. BOND
Defendant:
INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STUBLEN v. INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR
as 2:2011cv66932
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. STUBLEN
Defendant:
INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLLOWELL et al v. INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR
as 2:2011cv66890
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. HOLLOWELL and MICHAEL A. GLASSER
Defendant:
INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL JR. v. INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR
as 2:2011cv66889
Plaintiff:
STANLEY W. POWELL JR.
Defendant:
INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEDET et al v. INC AC&S et al
as 2:2011cv60338
Plaintiff:
JACK G LEDET and URSULA LEDET
Defendant:
INC AC&S, CELOTEX CORPORATION, INC EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PREJEAN et al v. INC AC&S et al
as 2:2011cv60344
Plaintiff:
LIZZEM PREJEAN and STEVE PREJEAN
Defendant:
INC AC&S, CELOTEX CORPORATION, INC EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROYAL et al v. INC AC&S et al
as 2:2011cv60342
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROYAL and CATHERINE ROYAL
Defendant:
INC AC&S, CELOTEX CORPORATION, INC EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JUNCA et al v. INC AC&S et al
as 2:2011cv60337
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD J. JUNCA and VIVIAN C. JUNCA
Defendant:
INC AC&S, CELOTEX CORP., INC EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
