Cases 21 - 27 of 27
AMATAGA v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv62893
Plaintiff:
SOFALA AMATAGA, SOFALA AMATAGA, SOFALA AMATAGA and others
Defendant:
RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MILLER et al v. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC) et al
as 2:2009cv62890
Plaintiff:
ERVIN MILLER
Defendant:
INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC. , CRAIG SHIPBUILDING, MOORE DRY DOCK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLETCHER et al v. INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv62900
Plaintiff:
MARTIN FLETCHER, MARTIN FLETCHER, MARTIN FLETCHER and others
Defendant:
INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC., INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC., INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RUSSELL v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv62892
Plaintiff:
DANIEL VERN RUSSELL
Defendant:
RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WILLIAMS v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv62996
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIAMS, ROBERT WILLIAMS, ROBERT WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INCORPORATED and INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
NAU v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. et al
as 2:2009cv62891
Plaintiff:
FRED NAU, FRED NAU, FRED NAU and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD., INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC., INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SETTERBERG v. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv62913
Plaintiff:
DAVID SETTERBERG and DAVID SETTERBERG
Defendant:
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY, INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC. and NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.