Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Edward Tobinick, et al v. Steven Novella
as 16-16210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD LEWIS TOBINICK, a medical corporation d.b.a. The Institute of Neurological Recovery, INR PLLC, a Florida professional limited liability company d.b.a. Institute of Neurological Recovery and EDWARD TOBINICK, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN NOVELLA, an individual
:
SERVICE
Edward Tobinick, et al v. Steven Novella
as 16-16210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD LEWIS TOBINICK, a medical corporation d.b.a. The Institute of Neurological Recovery, INR PLLC, a Florida professional limited liability company d.b.a. Institute of Neurological Recovery and EDWARD TOBINICK, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN NOVELLA, an individual
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Edward Tobinick, et al v. Steven Novella
as 15-14889
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD LEWIS TOBINICK, a medical corporation, d.b.a the Institute of Neurological Recovery, INR PLLC, a Florida professional limited liability company, d.b.a. Institute of Neurological Recovery and EDWARD TOBINICK, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN NOVELLA, an individual and SOCIETY FOR SCIENCE-BASED MEDICINE, IINC
:
SERVICE
Edward Lewis Tobinick M.D., et at v. Steven Novella
as 2:2015mc00241
Plaintiff:
Edward Lewis Tobinick M.D., INR PLLC and Edward Tobinick
Defendant:
Steven Novella
Edward Lewis Tobinick, MD et al v. Novella et al
as 9:2014cv80781
Plaintiff:
Edward Lewis Tobinick, MD a medical corporation doing business as The Institute of Neurological Recovery, The Institute of Neurological Recovery, INR PLLC a Florida professional limited liability company doing business as Institute of Neurological Recovery and others
Defendant:
M.D. Steven Novella, Yale University, Society for Science-Based Medicine, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Geoffrey Michael Cahen and Cullin O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
