Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Naylor Medical Sales & Rentals, et al v. Invacare Continuing Care, Inc., et al
as 11-6044
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NAYLOR MEDICAL SALES & RENTALS, INC. and JERRY ALLEN UNDERWOOD
Defendant - Appellant:
INVACARE CONTINUING CARE, INC., fka Healthtech Products, Inc. and INVACARE CORPORATION
Naylor Medical Sales & Rentals, et al v. Invacare Continuing Care, Inc., et al
as 11-5844
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
NAYLOR MEDICAL SALES & RENTALS, INC. and JERRY ALLEN UNDERWOOD
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
INVACARE CONTINUING CARE, INC., fka Healthtech Products, Inc. and INVACARE CORPORATION
Naylor Medical Sales & Rentals, et al v. Invacare Continuing Care, Inc., et al
as 11-5820
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NAYLOR MEDICAL SALES & RENTALS, INC. and JERRY ALLEN UNDERWOOD
Defendant - Appellant:
INVACARE CONTINUING CARE, INC., fka Healthtech Products, Inc. and INVACARE CORPORATION
Invacare Corporation et al v. Home Med Plus, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Invacare Corporation and Freedom Designs, Inc.
Defendant:
Home Med Plus, LLC, Home Med Plus, Inc., Ronald J. Loumeau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Naylor Medical Sales & Rentals, Inc. et al v. Invacare Continuing Care, Inc et al
as 2:2009cv02344
Miscellaneou:
Dewun R. Settle
Plaintiff:
Naylor Medical Sales & Rentals, Inc. and Jerry Allen Underwood
Defendant:
Invacare Continuing Care, Inc, Invacare Continuing Care, Inc, Invacare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
Invacare Corporation et al v. Invacare Credit Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv01733
Plaintiff:
Invacare Corporation, Invacare Corporation, Invacare Supply Group, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Invacare Credit Corporation, Invacare Credit Corporation, C & C Homecare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
