Cases 1 - 10 of 16
JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS RESEARCH UK LIMITED (f/k/a GW RESEARCH LIMITED) v. APOTEX INC. et al
as 2:2023cv23141
Plaintiff:
JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS RESEARCH UK LIMITED (f/k/a GW RESEARCH LIMITED)
Defendant:
APOTEX INC., INVAGEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CIPLA LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
GW RESEARCH LIMITED v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03914
Plaintiff:
GW RESEARCH LIMITED
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., APOTEX INC., PADAGIS US LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
GW RESEARCH LIMITED v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
GW RESEARCH LIMITED
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., APOTEX INC., PADAGIS US LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD. et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD. et al
as 2:2018cv02620
Plaintiff:
SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD. and SUNOVION PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION et al v. INVAGEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
as 3:2017cv06375
Plaintiff:
MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION , JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA NV and others
Defendant:
INVAGEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Counter_claimant:
INVAGEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Counter_defendant:
CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL , JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA NV , JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv05005
Plaintiff:
MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION , JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA NV and others
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC., INVAGEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. et al
as 3:2016cv02394
Plaintiff:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS INC. , BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH , BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD., REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC., PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC. and others
Counter_claimant:
PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC.
Counter_defendant:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION , BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH , BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMA GMBH & CO. KG and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al v. HEC PHARM CO., LTD. et al
as 3:2015cv05982
Plaintiff:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS INC. , BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH , BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
HEC PHARM GROUP , HEC PHARM CO., LTD. , HEC PHARM USA and others
Counter_claimant:
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. , SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. , SUN PHARMA GLOBAL FZE and others
Counter_defendant:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION , BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH , BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMA GMBH & CO. KG and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SHIRE DEVELOPMENT LLC et al v. INVAGEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2015cv00367
Plaintiff:
SHIRE DEVELOPMENT LLC , SHIRE CANADA INC. and SHIRE INTERNATIONAL LICENSING B.V.
Defendant:
INVAGEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Counter_claimant:
INVAGEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Counter_defendant:
SHIRE CANADA INC., SHIRE DEVELOPMENT LLC and SHIRE INTERNATIONAL LICENSING B.V.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD. et al v. INVAGEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
as 2:2015cv00281
Plaintiff:
SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD. and SUNOVION PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Defendant:
INVAGEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Counter_claimant:
INVAGEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Counter_defendant:
SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD. and SUNOVION PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
