Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cortazzi De Oliveira et al v. Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank et al
as 1:2018cv20931
Defendant:
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank and Emilio Volz
Plaintiff:
Tancredo L. Cortazzi De Oliveira , Ramcor Overseas, Inc. , Belcher Islands Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Open Sea Investment, S.A. v. Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank et al
as 1:2017cv22366
Plaintiff:
Open Sea Investment, S.A.
Defendant:
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank and Emilio Volz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wax et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv24450
Plaintiff:
Barry Wax and Kenneth Rosen
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc., DraftKings, Inc., SAAHIL SUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOMEZ et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv23858
Defendant:
BDS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, PAYSAFECARD.COM USA, INC, MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Gerecs, ANTONIO GOMEZ and Ricardo Alejandro Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank
as 1:2014cv23590
Plaintiff:
Caroline Armstrong
Defendant:
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv00975
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
West Investment Banking Inc. v. Natale et al
as 0:2007cv60105
Plaintiff:
West Investment Banking Inc.
Defendant:
Carl Natale, Carl Natale, C.J. Natale, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Steinberg, et al v. A Analyst Limited, et al
as 0:2004cv60898
Plaintiff:
Marty Steinberg
Defendant:
A Analyst Limited, Amram Kass PC, Defined Benefit Pension Plan and others
Movant:
Stephanie Reed Traband
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
