Cases 1 - 10 of 14
GOLDSTEIN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2016cv02507
Plaintiff:
SHALOM GOLDSTEIN , SIMCHA GOLDSTEIN , SARAH B. GOLDSTEIN and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
BURKS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2016cv01102
Plaintiff:
ALAN BURKS , ALISON BURKS MCRUIZ , SARAH DENMARK DENSON and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Onsongo, et al v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and THE IRANIAN MINISTRY of INFO. & SECURITY
as 1:2016cv03896
Plaintiff:
Mary Onsongo, et al , Juliana Onyango , Marita Onyango and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and THE IRANIAN MINISTRY of INFO. & SECURITY, Republic of Sudan , Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of the Sudan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1610
Winfred Wamai, et al v. Republic of Sudan, et al
as 16-7048
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Winfred Wairimu Wamai, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Adam Titus Wamai, Diana Williams, Titus Wamai and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Republic of Sudan and Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Sudan
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and Iranian Ministry of Information and Security
Mary Onsongo, et al v. Republic of Sudan, et al
as 16-7050
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Mary Onsongo, Individually and for the Estate of Evans Onsongo, Enoch Onsongo, Peris Onsongo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Republic of Sudan and Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of the Sudan
Defendant - Appellee:
Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, Islamic Republic of Iran and Iranian Ministry of Information and Security
ESTATE OF SIAVASH BAYANI et al v. THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 2:2014mc00294
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF SIAVASH BAYANI, FATEMAH BAYANI, BANAFSHEH BAYANI and others
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, THE IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY and THE IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
Winfred Wamai, et al v. Republic of Sudan, et al
as 14-7125
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Winfred Wairimu Wamai, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Adam Titus Wamai, Diana Williams, Titus Wamai and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Republic of Sudan and Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Sudan
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and Iranian Ministry of Information and Security
Special Master - Appellee:
Stephen A. Saltzburg, Oliver Diaz, Jr., John D. Aldock and others
Mary Onsongo, et al v. Republic of Sudan, et al
as 14-7128
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Mary Onsongo, Individually and for the Estate of Evans Onsongo, Enoch Onsongo, Peris Onsongo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Republic of Sudan and Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of the Sudan
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and Iranian Ministry of Information and Security
Special Master - Appellee:
Stephen A. Saltzburg, Kenneth L. Adams, John D. Aldock and others
BAYANI et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2012cv01824
Plaintiff:
FATEMEH BAYANI , BANAFSHEH BAYANI and BABAK BAYANI
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY and IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
COHEN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2012cv01496
Plaintiff:
ORA COHEN , SHALOM COHEN , SHOKAT SADIAN and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY, IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
