Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Baez Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Iris Yolanda Baez Torres
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Fetner et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01025
Plaintiff:
Iris Fetner and Charles Fetner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. E. I. du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2023cv02733
Plaintiff:
Iris Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Still v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02253
Plaintiff:
Iris Still
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newson et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00954
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Iris Newson and Michael Newson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bautistar v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00470
Plaintiff:
Iris Bautistar
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Natural Essentials, Inc. v. Iris LLC et al
as 5:2020cv02730
Defendant:
Iris LLC, Albert Banoun and Iris LLC doing business as Iris Lab Solutions
Plaintiff:
Natural Essentials, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Moore v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05566
Plaintiff:
Iris Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2019cv02807
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and United States Attorney
Plaintiff:
Iris Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nelson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03072
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Iris Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
