Cases 1 - 10 of 21
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN v. MS. CLEAN SERVICES, INC. AND ESTELLA WALKER
as 2:2023cv22161
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN
Defendant:
MS. CLEAN SERVICES, INC. AND ESTELLA WALKER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN et al
as 2:2023cv02131
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN and ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND HAROLD E. GELBER
Defendant:
THE CENTERS FOR HABILITATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Fun
ITPEU PENSION FUND et al v. UNIVERSAL SERVICES PROVIDER, LLC
as 2:2022cv05732
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND and ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL SERVICES PROVIDER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
ITPEU PENSION FUND et al v. APEX LIMITED, INC.
as 2:2022cv02386
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND and ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
APEX LIMITED, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
ITPEU PENSION FUND et al v. WORLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv09727
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN, ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND HAROLD GELBER, ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant:
WORLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. and BLACKSTONE GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ITPEU PENSION FUND et al v. NSR SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2020cv00816
Defendant:
NSR SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and ITPEU PENSION FUND
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN et al v. PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00690
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN and ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND HAROLD E. GELBER
Defendant:
TNG ASSOCIATES, LLC and PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN et al v. PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00677
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN and ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND HAROLD E. GELBER
Defendant:
TNG ASSOCIATES, LLC and PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ITPEU PENSION FUND et al v. COMPREHENSIVE SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2019cv21209
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN, ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND HAROLD E. GELBER, ITPEU ANNUAL BENEFIT FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JOHN MORGAN and others
Defendant:
Comprehensive Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN et al v. WW CONTRACTORS, INC.
as 2:2019cv18715
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN and ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND HAROLD E. GELBER
Defendant:
WW CONTRACTORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
