Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Irving H. Picard v. Ida Fishman Revocable Trust
as 12-2500
Defendant / Appellee:
Stacy L. Koff, Kenneth L. Evenstad Revocable Trust, u/a/d May 2, 2000, Leslie Aufzein Levine and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Association of Bankruptcy Trustees
Petitioner:
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and Financial Institution Defendants
Intervenor:
Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Statutory Intervenor pursuant to Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. section 78eee(d)
Plaintiff:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, and Bernard L. Madoff
Debtor:
In re: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Irving H. Picard v. Ida Fishman Revocable Trust
as 12-2497
Defendant / Appellee:
Stacy L. Koff, Kenneth L. Evenstad Revocable Trust, u/a/d May 2, 2000, Leslie Aufzein Levine and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Association of Bankruptcy Trustees
Petitioner:
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and Financial Institution Defendants
Intervenor:
Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Statutory Intervenor pursuant to Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. section 78eee(d)
Debtor:
In re: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, and Bernard L. Madoff
In Re: Bernard L. Madoff Inves
as 12-2194
Debtor:
In re: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Intervenor:
Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Appellee:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated SIPA Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and the Estate of Bernard L. Madoff
Appellant:
Maxam Absolute Return Fund Limited
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1669
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Bernard L. Madoff Investment
as 12-1669
Debtor:
In re: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Appellee:
Irving H. Picard, as Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Claimant:
Susanne Stone Marshall
Intervenor:
Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Statutory Intervenor under 15 U.S.C. section 78eee(d)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1646
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Bernard L. Madoff Inves
as 12-1646
Debtor:
In re: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Claimant:
Adele Fox and Susanne Stone Marshall
Intervenor:
Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Statutory Intervenor under 15 U.S.C. section 78eee(d)
Appellee:
Irving H. Picard, as Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Irving H. Picard v. Sonja Kohn
as 12-1106
Defendant:
Moishe Hartstein, Gerhard Randa, Daniele Cosulich and others
Debtor:
In re: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
UniCredit SPA, Alessandro Profumo, UniCredit Bank Austria AG and others
Intervenor:
Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Intervenor under 15 USC 78eee(d)
In Re: Bernard L. Madoff Inves
as 12-529
Debtor:
In re: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Intervenor:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Appellee:
Irving H. Picard
Appellant:
Upstate New York Bakery Drivers and Industry Pension Fund
In Re: Bernard L. Madoff Inves
as 12-437
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Appellee:
Irving H. Picard
Claimant:
Neva Rosamilia and Nicholas Rosamilia
Intervenor:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Debtor:
In re: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
