Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Scott Walker, et al v. Moe's Southwest Grill, LLC, et al
as 13-15913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT WALKER and STEVEN WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MOE'S SOUTHWEST GRILL, LLC, RAVING BRAND HOLDINGS, INC., RAVING BRANDS, INC. and others
:
SERVICE
Rounding Third, LLC, et al v. Moe's Southwest Grill, LLC, et al
as 12-12714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID TITSHAW, ROUNDING THIRD, LLC, JIMMY LEGS GROUP, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MOE'S SOUTHWEST GRILL, LLC, RAVING BRAND HOLDINGS, INC., RAVINGS BRANDS, INC. and others
:
SERVICE
Moe Dreams, LLC et al v. Sprock et al
as 1:2008cv00196
Plaintiff:
Moe Dreams, LLC, Moe Dreams, LLC, Moe Dreams, LLC and others
Defendant:
H. Martin Sprock, III, Daryl Dollinger, Carl Griffenkranz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
CCM Restaurants, LLC et al v. Moe's Southwest Grill, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv02888
Plaintiff:
CCM Restaurants, LLC, JFM Restaurants, LLC, SMI Restaurants, LLC and others
Defendant:
Moe's Southwest Grill, LLC, Moe's Southwest Holdings, LLC, Raving Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Massey, Inc. et al v. Moe's Southwest Grill, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00741
Plaintiff:
Massey, Inc., Massey, Inc., Richard Brown and others
Defendant:
Moe's Southwest Grill, LLC, Moe's Southwest Grill, LLC, Raving Brand Holdings, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Moe's Southwest Grill, LLC, Raving Brand Holdings, Inc., Raving Brands, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Fusion Foods of Tennessee, Inc., Fusion Foods of Tennessee, Inc., Fusion Foods of Tennessee, Inc. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Robert Dreesch, Steven Egan-Fowler, Brad Dunning and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Moe's Southwest Grill, LLC, Raving Brand Holdings, Inc., Raving Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
