Cases 1 - 10 of 30
BORGHI et al v. ONEWEST BANK, FSB et al
as 2:2015cv00323
Plaintiff:
PAUL BORGHI and BONNIE BORGHI
Defendant:
ONEWEST BANK, FSB, INDYMAC BANK, FSB, CIT GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SANTAMARIA v. INDYMAC BANK, FSB et al
as 2:2014cv05205
Defendant:
INDYMAC BANK, FSB, ONE WEST BANK, FSB, FANNIE MAE and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO SANTAMARIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
HERZOG v. INDYMAC BANK, FSB et al
as 3:2011cv04571
Plaintiff:
AMY HERZOG
Defendant:
INDYMAC BANK, FSB, ONEWEST BANK, FSB and GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04442
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
MUHAMMAD v. INDYMAC BANK FSB
as 2:2010cv04418
Plaintiff:
DAVID MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
INDYMAC BANK FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BLACKMORE et al v. WITTER et al
as 2:2009cv00640
Plaintiff:
PETER BLACKMORE and DAUNNE BLACKMORE
Defendant:
ANTHEA WITTER, INDYMAC BANK, FSB, INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
ZURAWSKI et al v. MORGAN FUNDING CORP. et al
as 2:2008cv00794
Plaintiff:
ADAM ZURAWSKI, GINA WARDLOW-HILL, LAWRENCE HILL and others
Defendant:
MORGAN FUNDING CORP., CHRISTOPHER NANGANO, NATIONAL FUTURE MORTGAGE,INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GARCIA v. HOMEBLANC, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00572
Plaintiff:
MARTHA GARCIA
Defendant:
HOMEBLANC, LLC, LANDPRO TITLE SERVICES, LLC, INDYMAC BANK, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
