Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Infineon Technologies AG et al v. Infinition, Inc.
as 3:2017cv06566
Plaintiff: Infineon Technologies AG and Infineon Technologies Americas Corp.
Defendant: Infinition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Infineon Technologies AG et al v. Redcom Laboratories, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv04075
Plaintiff: Infineon Technologies AG and Infineon Technologies Americas Corp.
Defendant: Redcom Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
M A-COM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. et al v. Infineon Technologies AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02859
Defendant: Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies Americas Corporation and International Rectifier Corporation
Plaintiff: MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. and Nitronex, LLC
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16412
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: SHANNON CASHION, W. CHRISTOPHER MCDONOUGH and KELLY KRESS
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16361
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: DAVID C. MARLOW
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16364
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: BARBARA COCHRAN, JAMES GLASE and BRYAN MARCUS
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16360
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: NORMAN D. PALMER and ESTATE OF FERN COOK
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16342
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: SEAN KENNETH HULL, RAYMOND FRANCIS CAMPBELL and SUPEROXYGEN, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
JACO Electronics, Inc v. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv01212
Plaintiff: JACO Electronics, Inc, Sun Microsystems, Inc., Unisys Corporation and others
Defendant: Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc., Mosel Vitelic, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: City of Los Angeles, et al.
Intervenor: Kimball Electronics Tampa, Inc. FKA Reptron Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Infineon Technologies AG v. Volterra Semiconductor Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv06239
Plaintiff: Infineon Technologies AG
Defendant: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?