Cases 1 - 7 of 7
De Witt Long v. Sugai, et al
as 22-15997
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DE WITT LAMAR LONG
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. SUGAI, Correctional Sgt. at Halawa Correctional Facility, sued in his/her individual and official capacities, LYLE ANTONIO, Chief of Security at Halawa Correctional Facility, sued in his/her individual and official capacities, SGT. WYATT, Correctional Sgt. at Halawa Correctional Facility, sued in his/her individual and official capacities and others
Long v. Sugai et al
as 1:2019cv00235
Defendant:
Lyle Antonio, Sgt. Sugai, John and Jane Does 1-50 and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Plaintiff:
De Witt Lamar Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peter Tia v. Sue Beitia, et al
as 17-16207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER RAY TIA
Defendant - Appellee:
SUE BEITIA, Clerk - USDC Honolulu, sued individually and officially, ALAN ASATO, Inmate Grievance Officer at Halawa Correctional Facility, sued individually and officially, TOMMY LIU, Inmate Grievance Specialist at Halawa Correctional Facility, sued individually and officially and others
Tia v. HCF et al
as 1:2016cv00645
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
HCF, Libio Hernandez, Department of Public Safety (DPS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2016cv00604
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Libio Hernandez, HCF Inmate Grievance Officer, Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Halawa Correctional Facility (HCF) et al
as 1:2016cv00523
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Halawa Correctional Facility (HCF), Department of the Attorney General, The, Alberta Cardus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. DPS Inmate Grievance Officers et al
as 1:2013cv00640
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Defendant:
DPS Inmate Grievance Officers, CCA Contractor Grievance Coordinators and Jody Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
