Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 103
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Artme A. Timofeev et al
as 2:2020cv04160
Defendant: Artem A. Timofeev, Apricode KDS, Corp., Artem A. Timofeev individually doing business as The Nickel Mine and others
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc., d/b/a Integrated Sports Media, Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Norma Elizabeth Mondragon Hernandez
as 2:2020cv04153
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media, Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant: Norma Elizabeth Mondragon Hernandez and Norma Elizabeth Mondragon Hernandez doing business as Star Burgers
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Hugo Ernesto Hernandez Algarin
as 2:2020cv02691
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc., d/b/a Integrated Sports Media, Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant: Hugo Ernesto Hernandez Algarin and Hugo Ernesto Hernandez Algarin doing business as La Antorcha Restaurante y Pupuseria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Maria Z. Valdez
as 2:2020cv02681
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media, Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant: Maria z Valdez, Maria Z. Valdez and Maria Z. Valdez individually doing business as Mi Querido Pulgarcito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Innovative Sports Management, Inc., d/b/a Integrated Sports Media et al
as 2:2020cv02662
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc., d/b/a Integrated Sports Media
Defendant: Jorge Alberto Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Edwin Uriel Alvarado et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv02655
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc., d/b/a Integrated Sports Media, Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant: Edwin Uriel Alvarado, Honduran Enterprises, Inc, Hector Leonel Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Jorge Alberto Valdez
as 2:2020cv02663
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc., d/b/a Integrated Sports Media, Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant: Jorge Alberto Valdez and Jorge Alberto Valdez individually doing business as Pulgarcito Sports Bar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Rios et al
as 1:2020cv01023
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media, Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant: Yasmin Rios and Kantu Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Arnon Raphael et al
as 2:2020cv01537
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media, Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant: Raphael Restaurant, Arnon Raphael, Alon Raphael and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Neil Sang Kwon
as 2:2020cv01522
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media, Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant: Neil San Kwon and Neil San Kwon individually doing business as Biergarten LA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?