Cases 41 - 50 of 66
FANNING et al v. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES J.B., LLC
as 1:2013cv01833
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PIPE LINE EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE IUOE AND PLCA NATIONAL PIPE LINE TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES J.B., LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
CHAMBERLAIN et al v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS GENERAL PENSION PLAN et al
as 1:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
MELVIN CHAMBERLAIN , JOHN PAXIN , ALBIN WATSON and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS GENERAL PENSION PLAN, MICHAEL FANNING, RODGER KAMINSKA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FANNING et al v. MICHELS CORPORATION
as 1:2012cv02024
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PIPE LINE EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PLCA NATIONAL PIPELINE TRAINING FUND
Defendant:
MICHELS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
HAINES et al v. GENERAL PENSION PLAN OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2012cv01870
Plaintiff:
BARBARA HAINES , DOROTHY LOUVEN and KIM SPEARMAN
Defendant:
GENERAL PENSION PLAN OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, CHRISTOPHER J. HANLEY, RODGER KAMINSKA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FANNING et al v. PIPELINE ENERGY GROUP, INC.
as 1:2012cv01184
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PIPE LINE EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PLCA NATIONAL PIPELINE TRAINING FUND
Defendant:
PIPELINE ENERGY GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
FANNING et al v. DIXIE SEEDING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2012cv00840
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PIPE LINE EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PLCA NATIONAL PIPELINE TRAINING FUND
Defendant:
DIXIE SEEDING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
FANNING et al v. C & A CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2012cv00790
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PIPE LINE CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION NATIONAL PIPE LINE TRAINING FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PIPE LINE EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
C & A CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
FANNING et al v. MIDWEST UNDERGROUND, INC.
as 1:2012cv00189
Defendant:
MIDWEST UNDERGROUND, INC.
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PIPE LINE CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION NATIONAL PIPE LINE TRAINING FUND, MICHAEL R. FANNING and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PIPE LINE EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
FANNING et al v. KING PIPELINE, INC.
as 1:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PIPE LINE EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PLCA NATIONAL PIPELINE TRAINING FUND
Defendant:
KING PIPELINE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
FANNING et al v. PETE GOULD & SONS, INC.
as 1:2011cv00434
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PIPE LINE EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PIPE LINE CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION NATIONAL PIPE LINE TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
PETE GOULD & SONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
