Cases 21 - 30 of 643
Colbert Nichols v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 21-16968
Petitioner / Appellant:
COLBERT F. NICHOLS
Respondent / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Gibson v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2021cv00476
Plaintiff:
Joaquin L Gibson
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels, Kyle Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chi Xia v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 21-16672
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHI XIA
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and ISIDRO BACA, Warden
Fernando Gallegos v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 21-16612
Petitioner / Appellant:
FERNANDO GALLEGOS
Respondent / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Ronny Powe v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 21-16534
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONNY POWE
Respondent / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
David Thompson v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 21-16347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, H. WICKHAM, Deputy Dir. of NDOC, COLLMAN, S C/O Mailroom Super and others
Defendant:
BRIAN SANDEVAL, ADAM LAXSULT, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Thompson v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Steve Sisolak, Aaron Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Entsminger v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv00295
Plaintiff:
Gregory West Entsminger
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Olivia Agle, Russ Alfano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv00272
Defendant:
William Gittere, Katherine Brodie, Dewayne Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D. Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Recktenwald v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 21-15900
Respondent / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL RECKTENWALD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
