Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
CLEAN LABEL PROJECT FOUNDATION v. THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv02311
Defendant:
ROWLAND COFFEE ROASTERS, INC., THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY and J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CLEAN LABEL PROJECT FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
BAKER v. GIPE et al
as 1:2014cv01483
Plaintiff:
GILBERT BAKER, JR.
Defendant:
BRUCE P. GIPE, R. S. BURKE, K. PFANZELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01654
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
SHAVON STEWART , A. D. , GEROLEAN CURETON and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
JOYNER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01610
Plaintiff:
DERRAN JOYNER , BETTY WYATT , M. W. and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
AL ODAH, et al v. USA, et al
as 1:2002cv00828
Plaintiff:
KHALED A.F. AL ODAH, OMAR RAJAB AMIN, MOHAMMAD R.M.R. AMEEN and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD H. RUMSFELD and others
Petitioner:
ASSOCIATED PRESS, NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY and USA TODAY
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES B. GITTINGS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
NW FOREST RESOURCE, et al v. SHEA, et al
as 1:1994cv01031
Plaintiff:
NORTHWEST FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL , SOUTH UMPQUA SCHOOL DISTRICT , WESTERN COUNCIL OF INDUSTRIAL WORKERS and others
Defendant:
BRUCE BABBITT and PATRICK SHEA
Movant:
NATIVE FOREST COUNCIL
Intervenor:
ASSOCIATION OF OREGON & CALIFORNIA LAND GRANT COUNTIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
