Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HOWARD v. SMITH
as 1:2016cv00617
Petitioner: DONNELL L. HOWARD
Respondent: WILLIAM J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROWN v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00555
Petitioner: STACY C. BROWN
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and WILLIAM J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HILL v. SMITH
as 1:2016cv00466
Petitioner: KEVIN K. HILL
Respondent: WILLIAM J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MITCHELL v. SMITH
as 1:2015cv00421
Petitioner: WALLACE MITCHELL
Respondent: WILLIAM J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RICHARDSON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv00351
Petitioner: JAMES N. RICHARDSON
Respondent: WILLIAM J. SMITH and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SPEIGHT-BEY v. SMITH
as 1:2014cv02016
Respondent: WILLIAM J. SMITH
Petitioner: MORRIS SPEIGHT-BEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2013cv01162
Petitioner: TYE J. SMITH
Respondent: JOHN DAVIS, COLORADO STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAGBY v. CHU et al
as 1:2013cv00099
Plaintiff: CEDRIC WAYNE BAGBY
Defendant: SHARON Y. CHU, VANESSA D. GILMORE, ANDREW J. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. FENTY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00748
Plaintiff: PHILLIPPE L. SMITH
Defendant: A. FENTY, D. BROWN, UNKNOWN ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF THE D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2008cv00754
Plaintiff: COURTNEY ANTHONY BAILEY
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THOMAS WINKFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?