Cases 31 - 40 of 122
Smith v. Ford et al
as 3:2020cv00501
Defendant:
St. Mary Shakayla, T. Sandoval, W. Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Willie T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NASH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv78361
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J NASH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NASH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv15000
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. NASH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NASH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv64409
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J NASH
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00693
Defendant:
Bradburn, J. Nash, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Bareno et al
as 2:2020cv00633
Defendant:
Sgt Benjamin Estill, Dr Bareno, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Quincy Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.,
as 2:2020cv00504
Defendant:
Scally, State of Nevada NDOC, B. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Domonic Ronaldo Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharkey v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2020cv00400
Defendant:
Aranas, Adam Laxalt, Wulff and others
Plaintiff:
James Sharkey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Rhymes v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 20-15183
Defendant / Appellee:
CYNTHIA SABLINCA and DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden
Defendant:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES G. COX, ARANAS, Dr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL L. RHYMES, AKA Primetime
Dryden v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2020cv00068
Defendant:
CO Moyia, CO Norman, Sgt Zelaya and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Dryden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
