Cases 1 - 6 of 6
A & B Campbell Family et al v. Chesakpeake Energy Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
A & B Campbell Family , Eugene J Barrett, Jr. , Lori R Barrett and others
Defendant:
Chesakpeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia,L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
NEWTON et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv72112
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. NEWTON, CAROL A. NEWTON, TAMMY L. NEWTON and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP., UNION ASBESTOS & RUBBER CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
NEWTON v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv61747
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J. NEWTON, JONATHAN J. NEWTON, JONATHAN J. NEWTON and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MALOOF et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv64006
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP MALOOF, LILLIAN MALOOF, RICHARD J. NEWTON and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP., UNION ASBESTOS & RUBBER CO. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC.
ThirdParty Defendant:
U.S.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
NEWTON et al v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv64393
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. NEWTON and TAMMY L. NEWTON
Defendant:
GAF CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE PRODUCTS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
NEWTON v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv60964
Plaintiff:
DAVID J NEWTON
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
