Cases 1 - 8 of 8
J B International LLC v. William Noble Rare Jewels LP et al
as 3:2022cv01422
Plaintiff:
J.B. International, LLC d/b/a J. Birnbach and J B International LLC doing business as J Birnbach
Defendant:
William Noble Rare Jewels, L.P., William Noble and William Noble Rare Jewels LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ELS Diamonds Ltd. v. Dayan et al
as 1:2015cv03224
Plaintiff:
ELS Diamonds Ltd.
Defendant:
Nissim Dayan, US1 Diamonds Inc. and J.B. International LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J.B. International, LLC v. Nikolas, LLC et al
as 1:2014mc00684
Plaintiff:
J.B. International, LLC
Defendant:
Christopher Kaufmann and Nikolas, LLC
J.B. International, LLC v. Nikolas, LLC et al
as 1:2014mc00685
Plaintiff:
J.B. International, LLC
Defendant:
Christopher Kaufmann and Nikolas, LLC
J.B. International, LLC v. Nikolas, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv08268
Plaintiff:
J.B. International, LLC
Defendant:
Nikolas, LLC and Christopher Kaufmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J.B. International, LLC v. Christopher Kaufman Jewelers et al
as 1:2013cv03884
Plaintiff:
J.B. International, LLC
Defendant:
Christopher Kaufman and Nikolas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dehres LLC, et al v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 12-10060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEHRES LLC, a New York limited liability company, RICK SHATZ INC., a New York corporation, J.B. INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a New York limited liability company, d.b.a. J. Birnbach and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON, subcribing to insurance Certificate NO: N088049/2623 an unicorporated association
Dehres LLC et al v. The Underwriters at Interest at Lloyd's London
as 1:2010cv21240
Plaintiff:
Dehres LLC , Rick Shatz Inc. , J.B. International, LLC and others
Defendant:
The Underwriters at Interest at Lloyd's London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
