Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Crystal City Emerald Inc. v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
Crystal City Emerald Inc.
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Shapiro & Massey, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Nolen v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 3:2014cv00382
Plaintiff:
Clarissa Nolen
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. , J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp. , J.P. Morgan Acceptance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridges v. EMC Mortgage, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00171
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage, LLC , J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Nationwide Trustee Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carvin L. Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robb et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv00240
Plaintiff:
Chad E. Robb and Stacey T. Robb
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and RBC Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seal v. Shapiro & Massey, LLP et al
as 1:2011cv00390
Plaintiff:
Tangela D. Seal
Defendant:
Shapiro & Massey, LLP , J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , U.S. Bank N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank National Association
as 1:2009cv00727
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Johnson
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Self v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2009cv00455
Plaintiff:
Jonathan B. Self
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Holloway v. Homecomings Financial, LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00107
Plaintiff:
Vicki Holloway
Defendant:
Homecomings Financial, LLC and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
