Cases 1 - 10 of 40
USA v. Jamar Hoking
as 23-2061
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMAR DEONTA HOKING
Dameion Sloan v. USA
as 22-3808
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAMEION JAMAR TAYLOR SLOAN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Deontea White v. James Corrigan
as 22-1768
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEONTEA JAMAR WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES CORRIGAN, Acting Warden
Jamar Evans v. Chris King
as 22-1467
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMAR LANELL EVANS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRIS KING, Acting Warden
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
USA v. Jamar Bloom
as 22-1038
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMAR JOCKESE BLOOM
Pleasant View Baptist Church, et al v. Saddler, et al
as 21-5788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PLEASANT VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH, PASTOR DALE MASSENGALE, MARYVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Plaintiff:
PLEASANT VIEW BAPTIST SCHOOL, VERITAS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY, HIGHLANDS LATIN SCHOOL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW G. BESHEAR, in his individual and official capacities
Defendant:
LYNNE M. SADDLER, in her official capacity
James WarrenIn re: James Warren
as 21-3643
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES JAMAR WARREN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Anthony McMullen
as 21-3379
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY JAMAR MCMULLEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Thomas McKinley
as 21-1195
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS JAMAR MCKINLEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
