Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Hartman et al
as 1:2008cv02248
Plaintiff:
James Hartman, Wilson Eshbach, Laborers Union Local 1174 Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Specialty Wood Working
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hartman v. D&D Rubbish Removal Corp.
as 1:2008cv02005
Plaintiff:
James Hartman
Defendant:
D&D Rubbish Removal Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hartman et al v. Jim Lagana Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01871
Plaintiff:
James Hartman and Frank Boyer
Defendant:
Jim Lagana Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hartman et al v. Fabcon, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01391
Plaintiff:
James Hartman, Frank Boyer, Laborers' Local No. 1174 Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Fabcon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hartman et al v. Conmas, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00922
Plaintiff:
James Hartman, Frank Boyer, Laborers' Local No. 1174 Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Conmas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hartman et al v. Aycock, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00197
Plaintiff:
James Hartman and Frank Boyer
Defendant:
Aycock, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hartman et al v. Kospiah Excavating
as 4:2007cv01995
Plaintiff:
James Hartman and Frank Boyer
Defendant:
Kospiah Excavating
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hartman et al v. White Construction, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00786
Plaintiff:
James Hartman and Frank Boyer
Defendant:
White Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hartman et al v. Total Construction Services Co., Inc.
as 1:2007cv00709
Plaintiff:
James Hartman and Frank Boyer
Defendant:
Total Construction Services Co. Inc. and Total Construction Services Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hartman et al v. Jocanz, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00133
Plaintiff:
James Hartman and Frank Boyer
Defendant:
Jocanz, Inc.
Garnishee:
Univest National Bank and Trust Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
