Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Mitchell v. Mayorkas
as 21-2987
Petitioner / Appellant:
O'Neil Damion Mitchell
Respondent / Appellee:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, James McHenry, Thomas Feeley and others
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Garland
as 21-1044
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Department of Justice, Executive Office For Immigration Review and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
P.L. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E
as 21-825
Plaintiff:
J.C., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R.F.J., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, P.L., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, A.Q., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Director Thomas R. Decker, Director of New York Field Office of ICE, in official capacity, Director Matthew Albence, Director Matthew T. Albence Executive Associate Director of ICE Enforcement Removal Operations, in official capacity, Daniel J. Daugherty and others
Vazquez Perez v. Decker
as 21-192
Respondent:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice and others
Petitioner:
Uriel Vazquez Perez, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
Valez-Chavez v. McHenry et al
as 1:2021cv00296
Defendant:
Director James McHenry, Immigration Judge Charles R Conroy, Acting Attorney Gen Jeffrey A. Rosen and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Valez-Chavez
Amicus Curiae:
The Legal Aid Society
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Barr
as 20-3712
Defendant / Appellant:
Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Executive Office For Immigration Review, James McHenry, in his official capacity as the Director of the Executive Office for Immigration and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Arana v. Barr
as 20-2133
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, United States Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Matthew Albence, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director Thomas Decker, New York Field Office Director for United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Pedro Arana
Arana v. Barr
as 20-2080
Respondent / Appellee:
Acting Director Matthew Albence, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Director Thomas Decker, New York Field Office Director for United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Pedro Arana
Reid v. Decker
as 20-1462
Respondent:
Attorney General William P. Barr, as Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, as Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, Director James McHenry, as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Petitioner:
Everod Reid
Ali et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv03337
Plaintiff:
Sonia Monir, Nowshin Ali, Ron Cerreta and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM BARR and Director James McHenry
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
