Cases 1 - 10 of 37
USA v. Jeffrey Beard
as 23-5659
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY RAY BEARD
Ronald ClarkIn re: Ronald Clark
as 23-1949
Petitioner:
In re: RONALD CLARK
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, MICHAEL WISENOWSIZ, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
USA v. Jeffrey Beard
as 23-5150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY RAY BEARD
Roy Springer v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 21-71392
Petitioner:
ROY SPRINGER
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Warden and ROB BONTA, The Attorney General of the State of California
Kevin Schrubb, Sr. v. CDCR, et al
as 21-55754
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN R. SCHRUBB, Sr., AKA Kevin Ray Schrubb
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, official capacity, JEFFREY A. BEARD, Former Secretary of CDCR, individual and official capacity, JANE DOE, Correctional Officer, individual and others
Darryl Dunsmore v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 21-55746
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRYL LEE DUNSMORE
Respondent / Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS and JEFFREY A. BEARD
Shaheed Scott, Sr. v. CDCR, et al
as 21-15443
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, R. L. BRIGGS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHAHEED SCOTT, Sr., AKA Rodney L. Scott
Jared Villery v. CDCR, et al
as 21-15425
Defendant:
M. PALLARES, OLEG LIFLYANDSKY, A. AITHAL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ACOSTA, Dr., JAY JONES, RICHARD KENDALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARED M. VILLERY
Louis Aguirre v. Clark Ducart, et al
as 21-15269
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARK E. DUCART, Warden, SCOTT KERNAN, S. BURRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS J. AGUIRRE
Defendant:
D. WELLS and D. WILCOX
Tedroy Davis v. Jeffrey Beard
as 20-56402
Petitioner / Appellant:
TEDROY DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
