Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Gregory Brown v. Cheryl Strange, et al
as 23-35145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY TYREE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL STRANGE, Secretary of Corrections, STEPHEN SINCLAIR, in their individual and official capacities, SCOTT J. RUSSEL, Deputy Secretary of Corrections and others
Alan Smith v. Jeffrey Uttecht
as 23-35058
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALAN JUSTIN SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center
Sloan Stanley v. Bob Ferguson, et al
as 22-35757
Petitioner / Appellant:
SLOAN PATRICK STANLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
BOB FERGUSON, Attorney General, JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden, Superintendent and KEVIN HANSON, Sgt.
Ronald Buzzard, Jr. v. Jeffrey Uttecht
as 22-35348
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD BUZZARD, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden
Thomas Boardman v. Jeffrey Uttecht, et al
as 22-35196
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS RUSSELL BOARDMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden and STATE OF WASHINGTON
James Landis v. Jeffrey Uttecht
as 18-35709
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES JOEL LANDIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden
Adan Yusuf v. Jeffrey Uttecht
as 18-35701
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADAN ISACK YUSUF
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden
Robert Middleworth v. Jeffrey Uttecht
as 18-35634
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT J. MIDDLEWORTH
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden
Christopher Tasker, II v. Jeffrey Uttecht
as 18-35628
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL TASKER II
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden
Mario Noyola v. Steven Hammond, et al
as 18-35350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO NOYOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN HAMMOND, M.D., Chief Medical Officer of the Washington Department of Corrections, JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden, Superintendant for Coyote Ridge Corrections Center, DICK MORGAN, Deputy Secretary of Washington Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
